T.J. Hockenson vs Mike Gesicki

Who should you start in Week 5? This week's matchups and projections.

TE15
T.J. Hockenson
MIN · Bye 6
167.5
projected 2026 points (PPR)
Season-long pick
VS
TE16
Mike Gesicki
CIN · Bye 6
163.4
projected 2026 points (PPR)

Who to start in Week 5

This week is a coin flip. The model leans Mike Gesicki by 0.4 projected points (10.6 vs 10.2), close enough that either call is defensible.

Mike Gesicki faces MIA, the 5th-friendliest matchup a TE can draw this week. T.J. Hockenson faces NO, the 10th-friendliest matchup a TE can draw this week.

Season-long, the model still ranks T.J. Hockenson ahead. This is a matchup call for Week 5, not a change of heart about the rest of the year.

This-week points are each player's projected per-game scoring rate adjusted for the matchup.

The season-long call

This one is a coin flip. The model leans T.J. Hockenson by 4.1 points of value over replacement (-24.5 vs -28.6), close enough that your roster build should break the tie.

The draft market hasn't priced this matchup yet, so treat it as a pure model call.

Setting your whole lineup? Sync your league and get a start/sit call for every roster slot, adjusted for this week's matchups and practice reports.
Optimize my lineup
T.J. HockensonMIN Mike GesickiCIN Edge
Week 5 opponent NO MIA
Projected Week 5 points 10.2 10.6 Gesicki +0.4 pts
Matchup rank (TE vs defense, of 30) #10 #5
Projected 2026 points (PPR) 167.5 163.4 Hockenson +4.1 pts
Points per game 9.9 9.6
Value over replacement (VBD) -24.5 -28.6 Hockenson +4.1
Overall rank #99 #105 Hockenson by 6
Position rank TE15 TE16
Market ADP 162.0 -
Typical round (12-team) Rd 14 -
Bye week 6 6

Should I start T.J. Hockenson or Mike Gesicki in Week 5?

This week is a coin flip. The model leans Mike Gesicki by 0.4 projected points (10.6 vs 10.2), close enough that either call is defensible.

Should I draft T.J. Hockenson or Mike Gesicki in 2026 fantasy football?

T.J. Hockenson. He projects 167.5 fantasy points with -24.5 value over replacement, vs 163.4 points and -28.6 for Mike Gesicki (TE, PPR). It's close enough to let roster needs decide.