Cade Otton vs T.J. Hockenson

Who should you start in Week 4? This week's matchups and projections.

TE20
Cade Otton
TAM · Bye 10
137.1
projected 2026 points (PPR)
Season-long pick
VS
TE21
T.J. Hockenson
MIN · Bye 6
132.3
projected 2026 points (PPR)

Who to start in Week 4

This week is a coin flip. The model leans T.J. Hockenson by 0.9 projected points (8.0 vs 7.2), close enough that either call is defensible.

T.J. Hockenson faces MIA, the 9th-friendliest matchup a TE can draw this week. Cade Otton faces GB, the 30th-friendliest matchup a TE can draw this week.

Season-long, the model still ranks Cade Otton ahead. This is a matchup call for Week 4, not a change of heart about the rest of the year.

This-week points are each player's projected per-game scoring rate adjusted for the matchup.

The season-long call

This one is a coin flip. The model leans Cade Otton by 4.8 points of value over replacement (-60.4 vs -65.2), close enough that your roster build should break the tie.

The draft market hasn't priced this matchup yet, so treat it as a pure model call.

Setting your whole lineup? Sync your league and get a start/sit call for every roster slot, adjusted for this week's matchups and practice reports.
Optimize my lineup
Cade OttonTAM T.J. HockensonMIN Edge
Week 4 opponent GB MIA
Projected Week 4 points 7.2 8.0 Hockenson +0.9 pts
Matchup rank (TE vs defense, of 32) #30 #9
Projected 2026 points (PPR) 137.1 132.3 Otton +4.8 pts
Points per game 8.1 7.8
Value over replacement (VBD) -60.4 -65.2 Otton +4.8
Overall rank #140 #148 Otton by 8
Position rank TE20 TE21
Market ADP - 162.0
Typical round (12-team) - Rd 14
Bye week 10 6

Should I start Cade Otton or T.J. Hockenson in Week 4?

This week is a coin flip. The model leans T.J. Hockenson by 0.9 projected points (8.0 vs 7.2), close enough that either call is defensible.

Should I draft Cade Otton or T.J. Hockenson in 2026 fantasy football?

Cade Otton. He projects 137.1 fantasy points with -60.4 value over replacement, vs 132.3 points and -65.2 for T.J. Hockenson (TE, PPR). It's close enough to let roster needs decide.