Mark Andrews vs Kyle Pitts

Who should you start in Week 6? This week's matchups and projections.

TE21
Mark Andrews
BAL · Bye 13
137.8
projected 2026 points (PPR)
Season-long pick
VS
TE22
Kyle Pitts
ATL · Bye 11
136.8
projected 2026 points (PPR)

Who to start in Week 6

This week is a coin flip. The model leans Mark Andrews by 0.9 projected points (8.8 vs 8.0), close enough that either call is defensible.

Mark Andrews faces CLE, the 3rd-friendliest matchup a TE can draw this week. Kyle Pitts faces CHI, the 15th-friendliest matchup a TE can draw this week.

This-week points are each player's projected per-game scoring rate adjusted for the matchup.

The season-long call

This one is a coin flip. The model leans Mark Andrews by 1.0 points of value over replacement (-55.0 vs -56.0), close enough that your roster build should break the tie.

The room sees it the other way: drafters take Kyle Pitts first (ADP 80.8 vs 133.0). If the model is right, Mark Andrews is the value pick, since the later cost buys the better 2026 projection.

Setting your whole lineup? Sync your league and get a start/sit call for every roster slot, adjusted for this week's matchups and practice reports.
Optimize my lineup
Mark AndrewsBAL Kyle PittsATL Edge
Week 6 opponent CLE CHI
Projected Week 6 points 8.8 8.0 Andrews +0.9 pts
Matchup rank (TE vs defense, of 28) #3 #15
Projected 2026 points (PPR) 137.8 136.8 Andrews +1.0 pts
Points per game 8.1 8.0
Value over replacement (VBD) -55.0 -56.0 Andrews +1.0
Overall rank #137 #139 Andrews by 2
Position rank TE21 TE22
Market ADP 133.0 80.8 Andrews +52.2 cheaper
Typical round (12-team) Rd 12 Rd 7
Bye week 13 11

Should I start Mark Andrews or Kyle Pitts in Week 6?

This week is a coin flip. The model leans Mark Andrews by 0.9 projected points (8.8 vs 8.0), close enough that either call is defensible.

Should I draft Mark Andrews or Kyle Pitts in 2026 fantasy football?

Mark Andrews. He projects 137.8 fantasy points with -55.0 value over replacement, vs 136.8 points and -56.0 for Kyle Pitts (TE, PPR). It's close enough to let roster needs decide.