Ty Johnson vs Antonio Gibson

Who should you start in Week 3? This week's matchups and projections.

RB73
Ty Johnson
BUF · Bye 7
41.5
projected 2026 points (PPR)
Season-long pick
VS
RB76
Antonio Gibson
NWE · Bye 11
40.9
projected 2026 points (PPR)

Who to start in Week 3

This week is a coin flip. The model leans Ty Johnson by 0.4 projected points (2.7 vs 2.3), close enough that either call is defensible.

Ty Johnson faces LAC, the 3rd-friendliest matchup a RB can draw this week. Antonio Gibson faces JAX, the 20th-friendliest matchup a RB can draw this week.

This-week points are each player's projected per-game scoring rate adjusted for the matchup.

The season-long call

This one is a coin flip. The model leans Ty Johnson by 0.6 points of value over replacement (-95.0 vs -95.7), close enough that your roster build should break the tie.

The draft market hasn't priced this matchup yet, so treat it as a pure model call.

Health note: Antonio Gibson carries an injury flag of Questionable (Knee - ACL), which is already reflected in his projection.

Setting your whole lineup? Sync your league and get a start/sit call for every roster slot, adjusted for this week's matchups and practice reports.
Optimize my lineup
Ty JohnsonBUF Antonio GibsonNWE Edge
Week 3 opponent LAC JAX
Projected Week 3 points 2.7 2.3 Johnson +0.4 pts
Matchup rank (RB vs defense, of 32) #3 #20
Projected 2026 points (PPR) 41.5 40.9 Johnson +0.6 pts
Points per game 2.4 2.4
Value over replacement (VBD) -95.0 -95.7 Johnson +0.6
Overall rank #194 #199 Johnson by 5
Position rank RB73 RB76
Market ADP - -
Typical round (12-team) - -
Bye week 7 11
Injury flag None Questionable

Should I start Ty Johnson or Antonio Gibson in Week 3?

This week is a coin flip. The model leans Ty Johnson by 0.4 projected points (2.7 vs 2.3), close enough that either call is defensible.

Should I draft Ty Johnson or Antonio Gibson in 2026 fantasy football?

Ty Johnson. He projects 41.5 fantasy points with -95.0 value over replacement, vs 40.9 points and -95.7 for Antonio Gibson (RB, PPR). It's close enough to let roster needs decide.