Parker Washington vs Carnell Tate
Who should you draft in 2026 fantasy football? Our machine learning model's projections, value over replacement (VBD), and the draft market's lean, refreshed every morning.
The call
This one is a coin flip. The model leans Parker Washington by 0.1 points of value over replacement (-17.1 vs -17.2), close enough that your roster build should break the tie.
The draft market agrees: Parker Washington goes first at ADP 64.8 vs 77.3 for Carnell Tate.
Health note: Parker Washington carries an injury flag of Questionable (Undisclosed), which is already reflected in his projection.
| Parker WashingtonJAX | Carnell TateTEN | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projected 2026 points (PPR) | 155.6 | 155.5 | Washington +0.1 pts |
| Points per game | 9.2 | 9.1 | |
| Value over replacement (VBD) | -17.1 | -17.2 | Washington +0.1 |
| Overall rank | #98 | #99 | Washington by 1 |
| Position rank | WR36 | WR37 | |
| Market ADP | 64.8 | 77.3 | Tate +12.5 cheaper |
| Typical round (12-team) | Rd 6 | Rd 7 | |
| Bye week | 7 | 9 | |
| Injury flag | Questionable | None |
Should I draft Parker Washington or Carnell Tate in 2026 fantasy football?
Parker Washington. He projects 155.6 fantasy points with -17.1 value over replacement, vs 155.5 points and -17.2 for Carnell Tate (WR, PPR). It's close enough to let roster needs decide.