Carnell Tate vs Jameson Williams
Who should you draft in 2026 fantasy football? Our machine learning model's projections, value over replacement (VBD), and the draft market's lean, refreshed every morning.
The call
This one is a coin flip. The model leans Carnell Tate by 3.9 points of value over replacement (15.7 vs 11.7), close enough that your roster build should break the tie.
The room sees it the other way: drafters take Jameson Williams first (ADP 44.5 vs 78.4). If the model is right, Carnell Tate is the value pick, since the later cost buys the better 2026 projection.
| Carnell TateTEN | Jameson WilliamsDET | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projected 2026 points (PPR) | 195.9 | 192.0 | Tate +3.9 pts |
| Points per game | 11.5 | 11.3 | |
| Value over replacement (VBD) | 15.7 | 11.7 | Tate +3.9 |
| Overall rank | #61 | #63 | Tate by 2 |
| Position rank | WR20 | WR22 | |
| Market ADP | 78.4 | 44.5 | Tate +33.9 cheaper |
| Typical round (12-team) | Rd 7 | Rd 4 | |
| Bye week | 9 | 6 |
Should I draft Carnell Tate or Jameson Williams in 2026 fantasy football?
Carnell Tate. He projects 195.9 fantasy points with 15.7 value over replacement, vs 192.0 points and 11.7 for Jameson Williams (WR, PPR). It's close enough to let roster needs decide.