Carnell Tate vs Michael Wilson

Who should you start in Week 5? This week's matchups and projections.

WR24
Carnell Tate
TEN · Bye 9
185.3
projected 2026 points (PPR)
Season-long pick
VS
WR27
Michael Wilson
ARI · Bye 14
176.1
projected 2026 points (PPR)

Who to start in Week 5

This week is a coin flip. The model leans Michael Wilson by 0.0 projected points (10.5 vs 10.4), close enough that either call is defensible.

Michael Wilson faces DET, the 20th-friendliest matchup a WR can draw this week. Carnell Tate faces HOU, the 25th-friendliest matchup a WR can draw this week.

Season-long, the model still ranks Carnell Tate ahead. This is a matchup call for Week 5, not a change of heart about the rest of the year.

This-week points are each player's projected per-game scoring rate adjusted for the matchup.

The season-long call

The model takes Carnell Tate: a clear but modest edge of 9.2 points of value over replacement (6.9 vs -2.3).

The room sees it the other way: drafters take Michael Wilson first (ADP 76.1 vs 79.9). If the model is right, Carnell Tate is the value pick, since the later cost buys the better 2026 projection.

Setting your whole lineup? Sync your league and get a start/sit call for every roster slot, adjusted for this week's matchups and practice reports.
Optimize my lineup
Carnell TateTEN Michael WilsonARI Edge
Week 5 opponent HOU DET
Projected Week 5 points 10.4 10.5 Even
Matchup rank (WR vs defense, of 30) #25 #20
Projected 2026 points (PPR) 185.3 176.1 Tate +9.2 pts
Points per game 10.9 10.4
Value over replacement (VBD) 6.9 -2.3 Tate +9.2
Overall rank #64 #76 Tate by 12
Position rank WR24 WR27
Market ADP 79.9 76.1 Tate +3.8 cheaper
Typical round (12-team) Rd 7 Rd 7
Bye week 9 14

Should I start Carnell Tate or Michael Wilson in Week 5?

This week is a coin flip. The model leans Michael Wilson by 0.0 projected points (10.5 vs 10.4), close enough that either call is defensible.

Should I draft Carnell Tate or Michael Wilson in 2026 fantasy football?

Carnell Tate. He projects 185.3 fantasy points with 6.9 value over replacement, vs 176.1 points and -2.3 for Michael Wilson (WR, PPR).