Kaden Wetjen vs Keon Coleman

Who should you start in Week 10? This week's matchups and projections.

WR69
Kaden Wetjen
PIT · Bye 9
81.5
projected 2026 points (PPR)
Season-long pick
VS
WR72
Keon Coleman
BUF · Bye 7
80.3
projected 2026 points (PPR)

Who to start in Week 10

This week is a coin flip. The model leans Keon Coleman by 0.6 projected points (5.4 vs 4.8), close enough that either call is defensible.

Keon Coleman faces NYJ, the 1st-friendliest matchup a WR can draw this week. Kaden Wetjen faces CIN, the 15th-friendliest matchup a WR can draw this week.

Season-long, the model still ranks Kaden Wetjen ahead. This is a matchup call for Week 10, not a change of heart about the rest of the year.

This-week points are each player's projected per-game scoring rate adjusted for the matchup.

The season-long call

This one is a coin flip. The model leans Kaden Wetjen by 1.2 points of value over replacement (-95.6 vs -96.8), close enough that your roster build should break the tie.

The draft market hasn't priced this matchup yet, so treat it as a pure model call.

Setting your whole lineup? Sync your league and get a start/sit call for every roster slot, adjusted for this week's matchups and practice reports.
Optimize my lineup
Kaden WetjenPIT Keon ColemanBUF Edge
Week 10 opponent CIN NYJ
Projected Week 10 points 4.8 5.4 Coleman +0.6 pts
Matchup rank (WR vs defense, of 28) #15 #1
Projected 2026 points (PPR) 81.5 80.3 Wetjen +1.2 pts
Points per game 4.8 4.7
Value over replacement (VBD) -95.6 -96.8 Wetjen +1.2
Overall rank #187 #190 Wetjen by 3
Position rank WR69 WR72
Market ADP - -
Typical round (12-team) - -
Bye week 9 7

Should I start Kaden Wetjen or Keon Coleman in Week 10?

This week is a coin flip. The model leans Keon Coleman by 0.6 projected points (5.4 vs 4.8), close enough that either call is defensible.

Should I draft Kaden Wetjen or Keon Coleman in 2026 fantasy football?

Kaden Wetjen. He projects 81.5 fantasy points with -95.6 value over replacement, vs 80.3 points and -96.8 for Keon Coleman (WR, PPR). It's close enough to let roster needs decide.